ACC ~ Luke 18 v24 - 30

THE CAMEL IS A THICK CABLE USED IN SAILING

CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA: The ruler was too weak in his intentions and could not be prevailed upon even to listen to the advice of selling his possessions, although it would have been good for him and full of reward. Our Lord lays bare the sickness that has its home in the rich, saying, “How hard it is for those that have riches to enter into the kingdom of God! I say to you, that it is easier for a camel to enter in through the eye of a needle than for a rich man into the kingdom of God.” Now by a camel he means not the animal of that name but rather a thick cable. It is the custom of those well-versed in navigation to call the thicker cables “camels.” COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 123. [1]

[1] CGSL 490**.

THE CAMEL REPRESENTS THE GENTILES AND THE PUBLICANS

AMBROSE: “It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” This is great power. It has great weight in words. With what other words would he more vehemently express that a rich person must not boast in his riches than these by which a compassionate person is defined as against nature? … You can also understand it morally, about every sinner and haughty rich person. When he did not dare to raise his eyes to God, the tax collector, burdened with the awareness of his own sins, was like a camel. Through the help of his confession, he will pass more easily through the eye of a needle than the Pharisee will enter the kingdom of heaven. The Pharisee was arrogant in prayer, boasting of innocence, and overconfident of glory. He rebuked mercy, proclaimed himself, and accused another. He would rather confront the Lord than beg him. [1] If anyone trembles at the camel, let him shudder at him whose deeds are uglier than a camel. EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 8.70-72. [2]

[1] See Lk 18:9-41.

[2] EHG 360-61**.

A CALL TO SELF-DENIAL

JOHN OF DAMASCUS: “How hard it is for those who have riches to enter into the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God!” When all the saints heard this command, they thought they should withdraw from this hardness of riches. They parted with all their goods. By this distribution of their riches to the poor, they laid up for themselves eternal riches. They took up the cross and followed Christ. Some followed, being made perfect by martyrdom, even as I have already told you, while others by the practice of self-denial did not fall short of them in the life of the true philosophy. Know that this is a command of Christ our King and God that leads us from corruptible things and makes us partakers of everlasting things. BARLAAM AND JOSEPH 15.128-29. [1]

[1] LCL 34:217**.

THE PAIN OF ABANDONING POSSESSIONS

CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA: It says, “Peter said to him, ‘Look, we have left all and followed you.’” [1] …

I imagine, to this some may reply, “What had the disciples given up? They were men who gained the necessities of life by their sweat and labor, being by trade fishermen, who perhaps owned a boat and nets somewhere. They did not have well-built houses or any other possessions. What did they leave, or for what did they ask a reward from Christ?” What is our answer to this? For this very reason, they made this most necessary inquiry. Since they possessed nothing except what was trifling and of slight value, they would learn how God will reward and gladden with his gifts those who likewise have left but little for the sake of the kingdom of God. They desired to be counted worthy of the kingdom of heaven because of their love for him. The rich man, one who has disregarded much, will confidently expect a reward. He who possessed little and abandoned it, how was it not right to ask what hopes he might entertain? For this reason, as representing those in the same condition of their having left little, they say, “Behold, we have left all and followed you.”

It is further necessary to observe also this. Correctly considered, the pain of abandoning is the same whether one abandons much or little. Come and let us see the real meaning of the matter by a trivial example. Suppose two men had to stand naked. The one took off expensive clothes while the other put off only what was cheap and easy to get. Would not the pain of the nakedness be equal in both cases? What possible doubt can there be on this point? As far as regards obedience and good will, those who had different circumstances and yet practiced equal readiness and willingly sold what they had must be placed on an equal footing with the rich. The very wise Paul also takes up their cause. He wrote, “If there be a ready mind, it is accepted according to what a man has and not according to what he has not.” [2] Thus inquiry of the holy apostles was not unreasonable. COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 124. [3]

[1] Mt 19:27.

[2] 2 Cor 8:12.

[3] CGSL 492-93**.